Skip to main content

Outsourcing Project Management Functions




Outsourcing Project Management Functions Every initiative to standardize project management internally or to outsource PMO or project management functions externally (BPO) should begin with a discovery phase to adapt project management solutions to the organizations they serve, with the goal of ensuring the successful, consistent, and predictable delivery of projects. We have a global capability and reach to provide effective BPO solutions for your project management functions.Cookie-cutter approaches from outside an organization that are not emergent from the client’s internal structure and culture tend to fail. For this reason both standardization and BPO initiatives should begin with a maturity assessment using best practice standards to establish a performance baseline. A maturity assessment will be the predicate for establishing tools, templates, processes, and methodologies. Because standards from the Project Management Institute (PMI) are the most widely adopted globally, they should be used to assess the organization, which will lay the foundation for institutionalizing PMI standards in the management of projects throughout your organization.Standards are an essential ingredient when partnering with business specialists or outsourcing core activities to focused providers. The virtues of business collaboration are clear: innovation and efficiency. Most companies seem to think that the right way to structure outsourcing is equally clear: tightly managing, across corporate boundaries, the process of delivering projects. Yet most companies also admit that such arrangements involve trade-offs. Tightly coupled processes are often inflexible. We believe that settling for these trade-offs is a mistake. Companies at the cutting edge of process management handle critical cross-company processes as though they were networks rather than production lines. These companies have swapped their tightly coupled processes for loosely coupled ones, thereby gaining much-needed flexibility and improving their performance in the bargain. The key to achieving this kind of flexibility is standards. Standards are merely shared knowledge-worker processes to enable effective action. To become agile and cope with the uncertain global business environment, an organization must push “power to the edge”. This phrase refers to the ability of an organization to dynamically synchronize its actions, achieve management control, and increase the speed of management over a robust, networked organization structure via the ability to move information and decision-making capabilities to the edge – the interface between the organization and the systems the organization desires to influence or affect, i.e. project teams. This occurs through the centralization of standards that give teams maximum freedom of action. For this reason, the correct strategy is to leverage the most widely adopted project management standards from the global advocate of the project management profession: the Project Management Institute. Softleanerp is a leading expert in using the Project Management Institute’s OPM3 standard in the domains of project management, program management, and portfolio management, as well as organization enablers essential to project success, to assess organizations just like yours. In this manner, we will identify quickly and facilitate effectively the implementation of policies governing Organizational Project Management processes. This work predicates tailoring of process documentation and training of all necessary stakeholders in order to achieve consistent implementation of work methods and institutionalization of metrics. This will serve as both a baseline and a stepping stone to the implementation of controls demonstrating the capability of Organizational Project Management processes quantitatively you to demonstrate the value of your project management solutions at intervals in the future and to secure their continued implementation buoyed by subsequent maturity assessments each year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Project failure and how to take control

In recent times, it's become apparent that a major contributor to success or failure on software projects has to do with team communication, both internally and outwardly. From a systems view, creating great application is about taking expert thinking and domain knowledge, and then effectively moving it about the team in short reviews loops. This rapid-fire venture and conversation is what blends the minds of a team in both an additive and combinatorial process to create top quality killer apps. Killer software are essentially software models of the thinking mind, in order for normally stupid device to mimic the logic of intelligence creatures. Three key ingredients often determine project failure or success: domain knowledge, deadlines, and dialog. You can think of them as "The Three Ds. inch Domain knowledge is evident. It takes smart people with the right knowledge to create the right stuff. Deadlines are also critical - there must be satisfactory time to make things

How to deal with project executives.

Right now, when I say deal with, of course I do not mean a great away Battle Royal cage go with your Project Executive (PE). After all, when you come to a point in the project and you and the PE differ, fundamentally (on a specific merchant, let's say). Let's presume, for the purpose of this article, you have already sat down and reviewed the issue on sensible conditions and you still both sit on contrary sides of the concern... what do you do? As the Project Supervisor (PM), you are in charge of ensuring the achievements of the project. As the PE, your colleague will be accountable for the success of the job. You both have a lot at stake, so some discussions can get quite heated. There are a few things you can do to solve this: Try to determine the PE's motivation for their decision. Are they determined purely by the success of the project, and there other areas that may be influencing them? Their boss? Office national politics? Desire to be acknowledged? After get

Top skills for successful project leaders

I would say in working over numerous enterprises and with various Executives, authority is the main key to venture achievement. I've seen unremarkable undertakings prevail with fantastic authority while beyond any doubt to-succeed ventures flop because of an absence of initiative. Along these lines, finding and keeping the best venture pioneers is basic. What are the top attributes of fruitful venture pioneers? Extend pioneers do the accompanying: Set Direction. Similarly as with all pioneers, it is essential for venture pioneers to set heading. It is the pioneer's duty to build up the technique and convey it obviously and over and again to the venture group and all through the association. There is a colossal distinction in a venture group with an unmistakable heading where everybody knows how they fit in and how they contribute esteem, than in the ones where the venture pioneer may know it, yet every other person sees just their little bit of the bewilder - not the est