Skip to main content

Secrets to Project Success



There is not any worse person to be than the project supervisor at the end of a failed project. Since an IT project director, I have experienced that feeling and I can tell you it's not nice. IT projects are particularly difficult to control. In fact there really aren't any IT tasks, just projects that contain elements of IT in them.

The trouble with these projects is that often you are doing something that was not done before, is unproven or cutting edge. Customers expect a good result not excuses, even though these projects are frequently a journey into the mysterious. If we take those construction industry, building a new bridge for illustration, we've been building connections for centuries and know how to do it. We understand how things are going to occur, in what order and the expected result. This is rarely the case with IT projects.

Avoiding the common pitfalls than it task management is not drive science; it is simply case of taking some sensible measures. Identified here are five killer faults of project management:
Who have Owns the Project?

The Mistake:

The nature of projects is change and change often encounters amount of resistance. People abhor change so they need to understand it is necessary and what benefits it will bring. In order for task management to deliver change it needs the backing of senior management. Without it the project will continue very slowly. The leader (senior management) is the person that drives the change forward and the project is the device for change. Task management without support from older management will struggle.

The perfect solution:

Make sure you have the top down backing up from senior management. Right now there must be direct communication from the sponsor to the stakeholders. The communication must be, "we are serious, this thing is going to happen so you are either around or you are not" and beware those that are not.

Be cautious as project manager to make certain the sponsor does not take those project over and become the de-facto task manager.

Getting Users Included

The Mistake:

Lack of user input and engagement is the recipe for a poor project. This can either be due to "we really know what you want" mindset from the IT office or deficiency of interest from the customer. In any event it must be avoided.

The Solution:

The IT office must take the time to understand the customer's requirements before suggesting any technical solution. Typically IT is blinded by the latest, hottest thing available and try to shoehorn the needs into it. On the other hands, customers must devote the time and effort necessary to ensure a successful project by getting together with the IT department and making sure all requirements have been fully defined. Make sure you have spoken to all stakeholders to gather their requirements and they continue to work with you throughout the project.

Preventing Scope Creep

The Problem:

Scope creep is the cause of more task failures than anything more. Being unsure of just what a task is aiming to supply or setting off in a proper of enthusiasm, but little else, is a formula for failure.

The Remedy:

Make certain that the business circumstance, requirements and scope are plainly defined and written about. Make sure the stakeholders understand them and signal them off. Stick rigidly to the scope of course, if changes are required then force them through a change management process where they are noted, justified and then decided upon.

Managing Expectations

The Mistake:

Often there is an expectation that THIS is like a powerful wand you wave and suddenly a miracle occurs. During a technology job, expectations can inflate to a ridiculous degree. This is the role of the project manager to manage expectations to a smart level.

The Remedy:

One way to avoid this is to break task management into smaller pieces or phases. My spouse and i equate this to a sausage machine, where you feed in the organic material at one end and out it is about as small, properly formed, packages or meat at the other end. The same can happen with IT projects where you take small plans of requirements and press them through the machine, producing several deliverables over the life of a project. This way you manage expectations by making frequent deliveries to show what the technology can really deliver. This procedure ensures the project offers to the customer's targets by giving them early on visibility of what you are building.

Understanding the Vocabulary

The Mistake:

Possess you ever stood next to a group of IT professionals and considered what on earth they were talking about. It can be like a whole new language also to non-IT people it often is. The pitfall comes when the customer and IT think they are talking the same language when in fact they are not. This brings about a problem when the IT division offers what they recognized the customer wanted and as it happens to be something different.

The answer:

Communication problems are the hardest to solve as often it is merely searching backside that the challenge is identified. Standard communication and an in depth working relationship with the consumer will help. What you really need is a person with a foot in both camps, who is aware of the business and the IT equally well. If perhaps you can identify this person ensure you keep keep of them, they may be very valuable. If you are struggling to find this person, the next smartest choice is to have two people, one from the business and one from IT. By simply working closely together and sharing information they can minimize any project communication problems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leading Managers Using Latest Resource Management Software

There are numerous resources available to a company a manager has to effectively coordinate in order for the company to succeed. These resources may include manpower, funds and information technology. Prior to the creation of resource management software, managers a new hard time designating the various resources to the diverse projects that the companies were willing to undertake. During this period, the managers worked in an environment that was packed with paper. It was at times inconvenient when it came to looking through these papers to gain access to the kind of information. It was irritating and time wasting for managers. This concern and the complexity of the resource management contributed to the introduction of affordable resource management software that has greatly aided in boosting the way that the managers synchronize and allocate these resources.
This has gone a long way in boosting the efficiency and accuracy and reliability of the managers as well as ensuring maximum…

Activity management manager

Activity management manager in a service business called requesting if I may help deploy a server-based EPM system. I started to ask the questions We always ask: "What kind of projects are they? How do you deal with these projects now? Just how big are your jobs, how many do you possess? Just how many people are resources in the system, how many people would be users? " only to have person stop myself in mid-stream to inform me that the answers to these questions were not important. They'd "already chosen the solution, " this individual told me and just needed anyone to make it work.

I discussed which i was in the solution business of course, if I couldn't understand the problem, I wasn't the person to deploy the solution. We talked a little longer and the condition the client kept conveying is that they got outgrown the scheduling they are yet to been doing manually using Outlook calendars and now required to "upgrade".

It's not the very…